Cricket and Tradition

Is it possible to be a cricket lover and not be a traditionalist?  Is it possible to be a cricket lover and not accept that cricket has to develop organically?

The ordinary form of cricket is increasingly one of limited over games which attract larger crowds and generate revenue.  The extraordinary form is longer but is more subtle: a deeper game.  Anybody can learn to understand cricket, but the rise of limited overs cricket, itself a response to the diminishing numbers of those attracted by the pure form of the game, has meant that many have remained faithful to cricket during the summer: not as many as in previous years, but enough to ensure that a structure was in place to attract and nurture young boys to dream of growing into the sort of men, their heroes, who could stride into the crease.

Many, of course, aspired to little more than the ordinary form of the game.  Until, two years ago, the, well, the superiority of the extraordinary form, what had for many years been the only form, enraptured not just those who had remained faithful, but countless numbers of people who were only really interested in what had become the ordinary form.  They were converted.

Is it a coincidence that His Holiness the Pope was elected right at the start of the 2005 season?  Is it too fanciful to suggest that he pondered what happened in England that year?

Many thought that his Motu Proprio should have come out sooner, but he had possibly reflected on the fact that the Ashes Series was later than any series in living memory.

His Holiness has reflected on the fact that he was not particularly sporty as a boy: one of the joys of cricket is that there is room in the family for those who will never be team captain, and maybe who will never make even the third eleven.  There is more to cricket than the team: there is the club.  We need scorers, groundsmen, people to man the entrance: we even need archivists.

Analogies will only take us so far, but I trust that the RCC will take a lead in welcoming the embrace of the Church in England and Wales of an expanding sense of Tradition and an understanding that knowledge of old and new things enriches the way we enjoy our cricket, and live our Faith.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Cricket and Tradition

  1. I attended my nephew’s baptism in Leeds last weekend. The party afterwards was, needless to say, in the local cricket club. The Paulinus boys and my brother-in-law and I started a 2-a-side game on a distant field away from the club bar when the boys became bored with the adult stuff (canapes, Tetley’s etc).

    It ended up a 25-a-side match with an age range of players from 4 to 75. Everyone played, everyone batted and bowled. “My Father’s house has many mansions” Indeed – and the Good Lord’s cricket match has many innings, too.

    Cricket is arcane, complex, difficult to understand at times but addictive and joyful for many people the world over – young and old. It’s value will endure beyond more vulgar, easier sports. The analogy between cricket and ecclesiology is not as far fetched as you might think.

  2. Pingback: The Haka « The Recusant Cricket Club

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s